draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06.txt   draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07.txt 
Network Working Group G. Fioccola, Ed. Network Working Group G. Fioccola, Ed.
Internet-Draft A. Capello, Ed. Internet-Draft A. Capello, Ed.
Intended status: Experimental M. Cociglio Intended status: Experimental M. Cociglio
Expires: January 26, 2018 L. Castaldelli Expires: March 4, 2018 L. Castaldelli
Telecom Italia Telecom Italia
M. Chen, Ed. M. Chen, Ed.
L. Zheng, Ed. L. Zheng, Ed.
Huawei Technologies Huawei Technologies
G. Mirsky, Ed. G. Mirsky, Ed.
ZTE ZTE
T. Mizrahi, Ed. T. Mizrahi, Ed.
Marvell Marvell
July 25, 2017 August 31, 2017
Alternate Marking method for passive and hybrid performance monitoring Alternate Marking method for passive and hybrid performance monitoring
draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06 draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07
Abstract Abstract
This document describes a method to perform packet loss, delay and This document describes a method to perform packet loss, delay and
jitter measurements on live traffic. This method is based on jitter measurements on live traffic. This method is based on
Alternate Marking (Coloring) technique. A report on the operational Alternate Marking (Coloring) technique. A report on the operational
experiment done at Telecom Italia is explained in order to give an experiment done at Telecom Italia is explained in order to give an
example and show the method applicability. This technique can be example and show the method applicability. This technique can be
applied in various situations as detailed in this document and could applied in various situations as detailed in this document and could
be considered passive or hybrid depending on the application. be considered passive or hybrid depending on the application.
skipping to change at page 2, line 7 skipping to change at page 2, line 7
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 26, 2018. This Internet-Draft will expire on March 4, 2018.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 27, line 15 skipping to change at page 27, line 15
could be beneficial. could be beneficial.
10. IANA Considerations 10. IANA Considerations
There are no IANA actions required. There are no IANA actions required.
11. Acknowledgements 11. Acknowledgements
The previous IETF drafts about this technique were: The previous IETF drafts about this technique were:
[I-D.cociglio-mboned-multicast-pm] and [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m]. [I-D.cociglio-mboned-multicast-pm] and [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m].
There are some references to this methodology in other IETF works
(e.g. [I-D.ietf-mpls-flow-ident], [I-D.bryant-mpls-sfl-framework]
[I-D.ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl], [I-D.ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation],
[I-D.ietf-bier-pmmm-oam], [I-D.mirsky-sfc-pmamm],
[I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework]).
In addition the authors would like to thank Alberto Tempia Bonda, The authors would like to thank Alberto Tempia Bonda, Domenico
Domenico Laforgia, Daniele Accetta and Mario Bianchetti for their Laforgia, Daniele Accetta and Mario Bianchetti for their contribution
contribution to the definition and the implementation of the method. to the definition and the implementation of the method.
12. References 12. References
12.1. Normative References 12.1. Normative References
[IEEE-1588] [IEEE-1588]
IEEE 1588-2008, "IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock IEEE 1588-2008, "IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock
Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and
Control Systems", July 2008. Control Systems", July 2008.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation [RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation
Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393, Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3393, November 2002, DOI 10.17487/RFC3393, November 2002, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3393>. editor.org/info/rfc3393>.
[RFC5905] Mills, D., Martin, J., Ed., Burbank, J., and W. Kasch, [RFC5905] Mills, D., Martin, J., Ed., Burbank, J., and W. Kasch,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms
Specification", RFC 5905, DOI 10.17487/RFC5905, June 2010, Specification", RFC 5905, DOI 10.17487/RFC5905, June 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5905>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5905>.
[RFC7679] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M., and A. Morton, [RFC7679] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M., and A. Morton,
Ed., "A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics Ed., "A One-Way Delay Metric for IP Performance Metrics
(IPPM)", STD 81, RFC 7679, DOI 10.17487/RFC7679, January (IPPM)", STD 81, RFC 7679, DOI 10.17487/RFC7679, January
2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7679>. 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7679>.
[RFC7680] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M., and A. Morton, [RFC7680] Almes, G., Kalidindi, S., Zekauskas, M., and A. Morton,
Ed., "A One-Way Loss Metric for IP Performance Metrics Ed., "A One-Way Loss Metric for IP Performance Metrics
(IPPM)", STD 82, RFC 7680, DOI 10.17487/RFC7680, January (IPPM)", STD 82, RFC 7680, DOI 10.17487/RFC7680, January
2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7680>. 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7680>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
12.2. Informative References 12.2. Informative References
[I-D.bryant-mpls-sfl-framework] [I-D.bryant-mpls-sfl-framework]
Bryant, S., Chen, M., Li, Z., Swallow, G., Sivabalan, S., Bryant, S., Chen, M., Li, Z., Swallow, G., Sivabalan, S.,
and G. Mirsky, "Synonymous Flow Label Framework", draft- and G. Mirsky, "Synonymous Flow Label Framework", draft-
bryant-mpls-sfl-framework-05 (work in progress), June bryant-mpls-sfl-framework-05 (work in progress), June
2017. 2017.
[I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework]
skipping to change at page 29, line 21 skipping to change at page 29, line 14
[I-D.ietf-bier-pmmm-oam] [I-D.ietf-bier-pmmm-oam]
Mirsky, G., Zheng, L., Chen, M., and G. Fioccola, Mirsky, G., Zheng, L., Chen, M., and G. Fioccola,
"Performance Measurement (PM) with Marking Method in Bit "Performance Measurement (PM) with Marking Method in Bit
Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Layer", draft-ietf-bier- Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Layer", draft-ietf-bier-
pmmm-oam-02 (work in progress), July 2017. pmmm-oam-02 (work in progress), July 2017.
[I-D.ietf-mpls-flow-ident] [I-D.ietf-mpls-flow-ident]
Bryant, S., Pignataro, C., Chen, M., Li, Z., and G. Bryant, S., Pignataro, C., Chen, M., Li, Z., and G.
Mirsky, "MPLS Flow Identification Considerations", draft- Mirsky, "MPLS Flow Identification Considerations", draft-
ietf-mpls-flow-ident-04 (work in progress), February 2017. ietf-mpls-flow-ident-05 (work in progress), July 2017.
[I-D.ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl] [I-D.ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl]
Bryant, S., Chen, M., Li, Z., Swallow, G., Sivabalan, S., Bryant, S., Chen, M., Li, Z., Swallow, G., Sivabalan, S.,
Mirsky, G., and G. Fioccola, "RFC6374 Synonymous Flow Mirsky, G., and G. Fioccola, "RFC6374 Synonymous Flow
Labels", draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-00 (work in Labels", draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-00 (work in
progress), June 2017. progress), June 2017.
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-encap] [I-D.ietf-nvo3-encap]
Boutros, S., Ganga, I., Garg, P., Manur, R., Mizrahi, T., Boutros, S., Ganga, I., Garg, P., Manur, R., Mizrahi, T.,
Mozes, D., and E. Nordmark, "NVO3 Encapsulation Mozes, D., and E. Nordmark, "NVO3 Encapsulation
Considerations", draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-00 (work in Considerations", draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-00 (work in
progress), June 2017. progress), June 2017.
[I-D.mirsky-sfc-pmamm]
Mirsky, G., Fioccola, G., and T. Mizrahi, "Performance
Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking Method in Service
Function Chaining (SFC) Domain", draft-mirsky-sfc-pmamm-01
(work in progress), June 2017.
[I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m] [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m]
Capello, A., Cociglio, M., Castaldelli, L., and A. Bonda, Capello, A., Cociglio, M., Castaldelli, L., and A. Bonda,
"A packet based method for passive performance "A packet based method for passive performance
monitoring", draft-tempia-opsawg-p3m-04 (work in monitoring", draft-tempia-opsawg-p3m-04 (work in
progress), February 2014. progress), February 2014.
[RFC5481] Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation [RFC5481] Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation
Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, DOI 10.17487/RFC5481, Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, DOI 10.17487/RFC5481,
March 2009, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5481>. March 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5481>.
[RFC6374] Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay [RFC6374] Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay
Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374, Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, September 2011, DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, September 2011, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6374>. editor.org/info/rfc6374>.
[RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New [RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New
Performance Metric Development", BCP 170, RFC 6390, Performance Metric Development", BCP 170, RFC 6390,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6390, October 2011, DOI 10.17487/RFC6390, October 2011, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6390>. editor.org/info/rfc6390>.
[RFC6703] Morton, A., Ramachandran, G., and G. Maguluri, "Reporting [RFC6703] Morton, A., Ramachandran, G., and G. Maguluri, "Reporting
IP Network Performance Metrics: Different Points of View", IP Network Performance Metrics: Different Points of View",
RFC 6703, DOI 10.17487/RFC6703, August 2012, RFC 6703, DOI 10.17487/RFC6703, August 2012,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6703>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6703>.
[RFC7276] Mizrahi, T., Sprecher, N., Bellagamba, E., and Y. [RFC7276] Mizrahi, T., Sprecher, N., Bellagamba, E., and Y.
Weingarten, "An Overview of Operations, Administration, Weingarten, "An Overview of Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance (OAM) Tools", RFC 7276, and Maintenance (OAM) Tools", RFC 7276,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7276, June 2014, DOI 10.17487/RFC7276, June 2014, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7276>. editor.org/info/rfc7276>.
[RFC7384] Mizrahi, T., "Security Requirements of Time Protocols in [RFC7384] Mizrahi, T., "Security Requirements of Time Protocols in
Packet Switched Networks", RFC 7384, DOI 10.17487/RFC7384, Packet Switched Networks", RFC 7384, DOI 10.17487/RFC7384,
October 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7384>. October 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7384>.
[RFC7799] Morton, A., "Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with [RFC7799] Morton, A., "Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with
Hybrid Types In-Between)", RFC 7799, DOI 10.17487/RFC7799, Hybrid Types In-Between)", RFC 7799, DOI 10.17487/RFC7799,
May 2016, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7799>. May 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7799>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Giuseppe Fioccola (editor) Giuseppe Fioccola (editor)
Telecom Italia Telecom Italia
Via Reiss Romoli, 274 Via Reiss Romoli, 274
Torino 10148 Torino 10148
Italy Italy
Email: giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it Email: giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it
 End of changes. 21 change blocks. 
37 lines changed or deleted 26 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.45. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/