draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-16.txt   draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-17.txt 
Network Working Group R. Stewart Network Working Group R. Stewart
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc. Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc.
Intended status: Informational Q. Xie Intended status: Standards Track Q. Xie
Expires: April 26, 2007 Motorola, Inc. Expires: June 1, 2007 Motorola, Inc.
M. Tuexen M. Tuexen
Univ. of Applied Sciences Muenster Univ. of Applied Sciences Muenster
S. Maruyama S. Maruyama
M. Kozuka M. Kozuka
Kyoto University Kyoto University
October 23, 2006 November 28, 2006
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address
Reconfiguration Reconfiguration
draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-16.txt draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-17.txt
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
skipping to change at page 1, line 41 skipping to change at page 1, line 41
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2007. This Internet-Draft will expire on June 1, 2007.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract Abstract
This document describes extensions to the Stream Control Transmission This document describes extensions to the Stream Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP) [RFC2960] that provides a method to reconfigure IP Protocol (SCTP) [RFC2960] that provides a method to reconfigure IP
address information on an existing association. address information on an existing association.
skipping to change at page 31, line 7 skipping to change at page 31, line 7
The authors wish to thank Jon Berger, Greg Kendall, Seok Koh, Peter The authors wish to thank Jon Berger, Greg Kendall, Seok Koh, Peter
Lei, John Loughney, Ivan Arias Rodriguez, Renee Revis, Marshall Rose, Lei, John Loughney, Ivan Arias Rodriguez, Renee Revis, Marshall Rose,
Chip Sharp, and Irene Ruengeler for their invaluable comments. Chip Sharp, and Irene Ruengeler for their invaluable comments.
The authors would also like to give special mention to Maria-Carmen The authors would also like to give special mention to Maria-Carmen
Belinchon and Ian Rytina for there early contributions to this Belinchon and Ian Rytina for there early contributions to this
document and their thoughtful comments. document and their thoughtful comments.
8. References 8. References
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2402] Kent, S. and R. Atkinson, "IP Authentication Header",
RFC 2402, November 1998.
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an [RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998. October 1998.
[RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629,
June 1999.
[RFC2960] Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Morneault, K., Sharp, C., [RFC2960] Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Morneault, K., Sharp, C.,
Schwarzbauer, H., Taylor, T., Rytina, I., Kalla, M., Schwarzbauer, H., Taylor, T., Rytina, I., Kalla, M.,
Zhang, L., and V. Paxson, "Stream Control Transmission Zhang, L., and V. Paxson, "Stream Control Transmission
Protocol", RFC 2960, October 2000. Protocol", RFC 2960, October 2000.
[I-D.ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth] [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth]
Tuexen, M., "Authenticated Chunks for Stream Control Tuexen, M., "Authenticated Chunks for Stream Control
Transmission Protocol (SCTP)", Transmission Protocol (SCTP)",
draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-04 (work in progress), draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-auth-06 (work in progress),
September 2006. November 2006.
Appendix A. Abstract Address Handling Appendix A. Abstract Address Handling
A.1. General remarks A.1. General remarks
The following text provides a working definition of the endpoint The following text provides a working definition of the endpoint
notion to discuss address reconfiguration. It is not intended to notion to discuss address reconfiguration. It is not intended to
restrict implementations in any way, its goal is to provide as set of restrict implementations in any way, its goal is to provide as set of
definitions only. Using these definitions should make a discussion definitions only. Using these definitions should make a discussion
about address issues easier. about address issues easier.
 End of changes. 8 change blocks. 
16 lines changed or deleted 7 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.33. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/