draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-19.txt | draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TEAS Working Group Xufeng Liu | TEAS Working Group Xufeng Liu | |||
Internet Draft Volta Networks | Internet Draft Volta Networks | |||
Intended status: Standards Track Igor Bryskin | Intended status: Standards Track Igor Bryskin | |||
Huawei Technologies | Huawei Technologies | |||
Vishnu Pavan Beeram | Vishnu Pavan Beeram | |||
Juniper Networks | ||||
Tarek Saad | Tarek Saad | |||
Cisco Systems Inc | Juniper Networks | |||
Himanshu Shah | Himanshu Shah | |||
Ciena | Ciena | |||
Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | |||
Telefonica | Telefonica | |||
Expires: August 11, 2019 February 11, 2019 | Expires: October 12, 2019 April 12, 2019 | |||
YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies | YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies | |||
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-19 | draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20 | |||
Status of this Memo | Status of this Memo | |||
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | |||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that | |||
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- | other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- | |||
Drafts. | Drafts. | |||
skipping to change at page 1, line 41 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 40 ¶ | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at | |||
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt | http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt | |||
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at | |||
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html | http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html | |||
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 11, 2019. | This Internet-Draft will expire on October 12, 2019. | |||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
skipping to change at page 32, line 46 ¶ | skipping to change at page 32, line 46 ¶ | |||
to the corresponding configuration. | to the corresponding configuration. | |||
5.10. Scheduling Parameters | 5.10. Scheduling Parameters | |||
The model allows time scheduling parameters to be specified for each | The model allows time scheduling parameters to be specified for each | |||
topological element or for the topology as a whole. These parameters | topological element or for the topology as a whole. These parameters | |||
allow the provider to present different topological views to the | allow the provider to present different topological views to the | |||
client at different time slots. The use of "scheduling parameters" is | client at different time slots. The use of "scheduling parameters" is | |||
optional. | optional. | |||
The YANG data model for configuration scheduling is defined in [I- | The YANG data model for configuration scheduling is defined in | |||
D.liu-netmod-yang-schedule], which allows specifying configuration | [I-D.liu-netmod-yang-schedule], which allows specifying configuration | |||
schedules without altering this data model. | schedules without altering this data model. | |||
5.11. Notifications | 5.11. Notifications | |||
Notifications are a key component of any topology data model. | Notifications are a key component of any topology data model. | |||
[I-D.ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications] and [I-D.ietf-netconf- | [I-D.ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications] and | |||
yang-push] define a subscription and push mechanism for YANG | [I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-push] define a subscription and push mechanism | |||
datastores. This mechanism currently allows the user to: | for YANG datastores. This mechanism currently allows the user to: | |||
- Subscribe notifications on a per client basis | - Subscribe notifications on a per client basis | |||
- Specify subtree filters or xpath filters so that only interested | - Specify subtree filters or xpath filters so that only interested | |||
contents will be sent. | contents will be sent. | |||
- Specify either periodic or on-demand notifications. | - Specify either periodic or on-demand notifications. | |||
6. Guidance for Writing Technology Specific TE Topology Augmentations | 6. Guidance for Writing Technology Specific TE Topology Augmentations | |||
The TE topology model defined in this document is technology agnostic | The TE topology model defined in this document is technology agnostic | |||
as it defines concepts, abstractions and attributes that are common | as it defines concepts, abstractions and attributes that are common | |||
across multiple network technologies. It is envisioned that this base | across multiple network technologies. It is envisioned that this base | |||
model will be widely used when defining technology specific TE | model will be widely used when defining technology specific TE | |||
topology models for various layer networks. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-wson- | topology models for various layer networks. | |||
yang], [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang], and [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te- | [I-D.ietf-ccamp-wson-yang], [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang], and | |||
topo] are some examples of technology specific TE Topology models. | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo] are some examples of technology | |||
Writers of such models are encouraged to augment the basic TE | specific TE Topology models. Writers of such models are encouraged to | |||
topology model's containers, such as TE Topology, TE Node, TE Link, | augment the basic TE topology model's containers, such as TE | |||
Link Termination Point (LTP), Tunnel Termination Point (TTP), | Topology, TE Node, TE Link, Link Termination Point (LTP), Tunnel | |||
Bandwidth and Label with the layer specific attributes instead of | Termination Point (TTP), Bandwidth and Label with the layer specific | |||
defining new containers. | attributes instead of defining new containers. | |||
Consider the following technology specific example-topology model: | Consider the following technology specific example-topology model: | |||
module: example-topology | module: example-topology | |||
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology: | augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology: | |||
+--rw example-topology! | +--rw example-topology! | |||
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/tet:te: | augment /nw:networks/nw:network/tet:te: | |||
+--rw attributes | +--rw attributes | |||
+--rw attribute-1? uint8 | +--rw attribute-1? uint8 | |||
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te | augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/tet:te | |||
skipping to change at page 47, line 22 ¶ | skipping to change at page 47, line 22 ¶ | |||
Editor: Xufeng Liu | Editor: Xufeng Liu | |||
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> | <mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> | |||
Editor: Igor Bryskin | Editor: Igor Bryskin | |||
<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> | <mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> | |||
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram | Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram | |||
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net> | <mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net> | |||
Editor: Tarek Saad | Editor: Tarek Saad | |||
<mailto:tsaad@cisco.com> | <mailto:tsaad@juniper.net> | |||
Editor: Himanshu Shah | Editor: Himanshu Shah | |||
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com> | <mailto:hshah@ciena.com> | |||
Editor: Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | Editor: Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | |||
<mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>"; | <mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>"; | |||
description | description | |||
"TE topology model for representing and manipulating technology | "TE topology model for representing and manipulating technology | |||
agnostic TE Topologies. | agnostic TE Topologies. | |||
skipping to change at page 92, line 18 ¶ | skipping to change at page 92, line 18 ¶ | |||
<CODE ENDS> | <CODE ENDS> | |||
8. Security Considerations | 8. Security Considerations | |||
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data | The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data | |||
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such | that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such | |||
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer | as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer | |||
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure | is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure | |||
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer | transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer | |||
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS | is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS | |||
[RFC5246]. | [RFC8446]. | |||
The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides the means to | The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] | |||
restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a | provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or | |||
preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol | RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or | |||
operations and content. | RESTCONF protocol operations and content. | |||
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are | There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are | |||
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the | writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the | |||
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable | default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable | |||
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to | in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to | |||
these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect | these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect | |||
on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and | on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and | |||
their sensitivity/vulnerability: | their sensitivity/vulnerability: | |||
o /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology | o /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology | |||
skipping to change at page 95, line 6 ¶ | skipping to change at page 95, line 6 ¶ | |||
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, | [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, | DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. | |||
[RFC3945] Mannie, E., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label | [RFC3945] Mannie, E., Ed., "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label | |||
Switching (GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945, | Switching (GMPLS) Architecture", RFC 3945, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC3945, October 2004, | DOI 10.17487/RFC3945, October 2004, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3945>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3945>. | |||
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security | ||||
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, | ||||
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008, | ||||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>. | ||||
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., | [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., | |||
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol | and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol | |||
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, | (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>. | |||
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure | [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure | |||
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, | Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>. | |||
[RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration | ||||
Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536, | ||||
DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012, | ||||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6536>. | ||||
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", | [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", | |||
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, | RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>. | |||
[RFC7926] Farrel, A., Ed., Drake, J., Bitar, N., Swallow, G., | [RFC7926] Farrel, A., Ed., Drake, J., Bitar, N., Swallow, G., | |||
Ceccarelli, D., and X. Zhang, "Problem Statement and | Ceccarelli, D., and X. Zhang, "Problem Statement and | |||
Architecture for Information Exchange between | Architecture for Information Exchange between | |||
Interconnected Traffic-Engineered Networks", BCP 206, | Interconnected Traffic-Engineered Networks", BCP 206, | |||
RFC 7926, DOI 10.17487/RFC7926, July 2016, | RFC 7926, DOI 10.17487/RFC7926, July 2016, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7926>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7926>. | |||
skipping to change at page 95, line 48 ¶ | skipping to change at page 95, line 38 ¶ | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>. | |||
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF | [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF | |||
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, | Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>. | |||
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC | [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC | |||
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, | 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, | |||
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. | May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. | |||
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration | ||||
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI | ||||
10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, <https://www.rfc- | ||||
editor.org/info/rfc8341>. | ||||
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., | [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., | |||
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture | and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture | |||
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, | (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>. | |||
[RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N., | [RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N., | |||
Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for | Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for | |||
Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March | Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March | |||
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345>. | 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345>. | |||
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol | ||||
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August | ||||
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. | ||||
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types] | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-types] | |||
Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and | Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., and | |||
I. Bryskin, "Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types", | I. Bryskin, "Traffic Engineering Common YANG Types", | |||
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-03 (work in progress), | draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-08 (work in progress), | |||
January 2019. | April 2019. | |||
10.2. Informative References | 10.2. Informative References | |||
[G.709] ITU-T, "Interfaces for the optical transport network", | [G.709] ITU-T, "Interfaces for the optical transport network", | |||
ITU-T Recommendation G.709, June 2016. | ITU-T Recommendation G.709, June 2016. | |||
[G.805] ITU-T, "Generic functional architecture of transport | [G.805] ITU-T, "Generic functional architecture of transport | |||
networks", ITU-T Recommendation G.805, March 2000. | networks", ITU-T Recommendation G.805, March 2000. | |||
[G.872] ITU-T, "Architecture of optical transport networks", ITU-T | [G.872] ITU-T, "Architecture of optical transport networks", ITU-T | |||
skipping to change at page 99, line 20 ¶ | skipping to change at page 99, line 19 ¶ | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>. | |||
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", | [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", | |||
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, | BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. | |||
[I-D.ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications] | [I-D.ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications] | |||
Voit, E., Clemm, A., Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and | Voit, E., Clemm, A., Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and | |||
A. Tripathy, "Customized Subscriptions to a Publisher's | A. Tripathy, "Customized Subscriptions to a Publisher's | |||
Event Streams", draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed- | Event Streams", draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed- | |||
notifications-12 (work in progress), April 2018. | notifications-23 (work in progress), February 2019. | |||
[I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-push] | [I-D.ietf-netconf-yang-push] | |||
Clemm, A., Voit, E., Prieto, A., Tripathy, A., Nilsen- | Clemm, A., Voit, E., Prieto, A., Tripathy, A., Nilsen- | |||
Nygaard, E., Bierman, A., and B. Lengyel, "YANG Datastore | Nygaard, E., Bierman, A., and B. Lengyel, "YANG Datastore | |||
Subscription", draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-16 (work in | Subscription", draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-22 (work in | |||
progress), May 2018. | progress), February 2019. | |||
[I-D.liu-netmod-yang-schedule] | [I-D.liu-netmod-yang-schedule] | |||
Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and | Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and | |||
O. Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Configuration Scheduling", | O. Dios, "A YANG Data Model for Configuration Scheduling", | |||
draft-liu-netmod-yang-schedule-05 (work in progress), | draft-liu-netmod-yang-schedule-05 (work in progress), | |||
March 2018. | March 2018. | |||
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-wson-yang] | [I-D.ietf-ccamp-wson-yang] | |||
Lee, Y., Dhody, D., Zhang, X., Guo, A., Lopezalvarez, V., | Lee, Y., Dhody, D., Zhang, X., Guo, A., Lopezalvarez, V., | |||
King, D., Yoon, B., and R. Vilata, "A Yang Data Model for | King, D., Yoon, B., and R. Vilata, "A Yang Data Model for | |||
WSON Optical Networks", draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang-10 | WSON Optical Networks", draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang-20 | |||
(work in progress), February 2018. | (work in progress), March 2019. | |||
[I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang] | [I-D.ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang] | |||
zhenghaomian@huawei.com, z., Guo, A., Busi, I., Sharma, | zhenghaomian@huawei.com, z., Guo, A., Busi, I., Sharma, | |||
A., Liu, X., Belotti, S., Xu, Y., Wang, L., and O. Dios, | A., Liu, X., Belotti, S., Xu, Y., Wang, L., and O. Dios, | |||
"A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network | "A YANG Data Model for Optical Transport Network | |||
Topology", draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-03 (work in | Topology", draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-06 (work in | |||
progress), June 2018. | progress), February 2019. | |||
[I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo] | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo] | |||
Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and | Liu, X., Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Shah, H., and | |||
O. Dios, "YANG Data Model for Layer 3 TE Topologies", | O. Dios, "YANG Data Model for Layer 3 TE Topologies", | |||
draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo-01 (work in progress), | draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo-04 (work in progress), | |||
March 2018. | March 2019. | |||
[I-D.ietf-teas-te-topo-and-tunnel-modeling] | [I-D.ietf-teas-te-topo-and-tunnel-modeling] | |||
Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., and X. Liu, "TE | Bryskin, I., Beeram, V., Saad, T., and X. Liu, "TE | |||
Topology and Tunnel Modeling for Transport Networks", | Topology and Tunnel Modeling for Transport Networks", | |||
draft-ietf-teas-te-topo-and-tunnel-modeling-01 (work in | draft-ietf-teas-te-topo-and-tunnel-modeling-03 (work in | |||
progress), March 2018. | progress), October 2018. | |||
11. Acknowledgments | 11. Acknowledgments | |||
The authors would like to thank Lou Berger, Sue Hares, Mazen Khaddam, | The authors would like to thank Lou Berger, Sue Hares, Mazen Khaddam, | |||
Cyril Margaria and Zafar Ali for participating in design discussions | Cyril Margaria and Zafar Ali for participating in design discussions | |||
and providing valuable insights. | and providing valuable insights. | |||
Appendix A. Complete Model Tree Structure | Appendix A. Complete Model Tree Structure | |||
module: ietf-te-topology | module: ietf-te-topology | |||
skipping to change at page 164, line 31 ¶ | skipping to change at page 164, line 31 ¶ | |||
Editor: Xufeng Liu | Editor: Xufeng Liu | |||
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> | <mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> | |||
Editor: Igor Bryskin | Editor: Igor Bryskin | |||
<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> | <mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> | |||
Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram | Editor: Vishnu Pavan Beeram | |||
<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net> | <mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net> | |||
Editor: Tarek Saad | Editor: Tarek Saad | |||
<mailto:tsaad@cisco.com> | <mailto:tsaad@juniper.net> | |||
Editor: Himanshu Shah | Editor: Himanshu Shah | |||
<mailto:hshah@ciena.com> | <mailto:hshah@ciena.com> | |||
Editor: Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | Editor: Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | |||
<mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>"; | <mailto:oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>"; | |||
description | description | |||
"TE topology state model. | "TE topology state model. | |||
skipping to change at page 210, line 44 ¶ | skipping to change at page 210, line 44 ¶ | |||
Igor Bryskin | Igor Bryskin | |||
Huawei Technologies | Huawei Technologies | |||
Email: Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com | Email: Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com | |||
Vishnu Pavan Beeram | Vishnu Pavan Beeram | |||
Juniper Networks | Juniper Networks | |||
Email: vbeeram@juniper.net | Email: vbeeram@juniper.net | |||
Tarek Saad | Tarek Saad | |||
Cisco Systems Inc | Juniper Networks | |||
Email: tsaad@cisco.com | Email: tsaad@juniper.net | |||
Himanshu Shah | Himanshu Shah | |||
Ciena | Ciena | |||
Email: hshah@ciena.com | Email: hshah@ciena.com | |||
Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | Oscar Gonzalez De Dios | |||
Telefonica | Telefonica | |||
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com | Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com | |||
End of changes. 24 change blocks. | ||||
50 lines changed or deleted | 48 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |