* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Regext Status Pages

Registration Protocols Extensions (Active WG)
Art Area: Alexey Melnikov, Alissa Cooper, Ben Campbell | 2016-Mar-04 —  
Chairs
 
 


2017-02-16 charter

Registration Protocols Extensions (regext)
------------------------------------------

 Charter

 Current Status: Active

 Chairs:
     Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
     James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>

 Applications and Real-Time Area Directors:
     Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
     Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
     Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>

 Applications and Real-Time Area Advisor:
     Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>

 Mailing Lists:
     General Discussion: regext@ietf.org
     To Subscribe:       https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
     Archive:            https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/

Description of Working Group:

  The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP, Standard 69) is the
  standard domain name provisioning protocol for top-level domain name
  registries.  To avoid many separate EPP extensions that provide
  the same functions, it's important to coordinate and standardize EPP
  extensions.

  The EPP Extensions (EPPEXT) working group completed its first goal of
  creating an IANA registry of EPP extensions.  The registration process
  of the registry is documented in RFC7451.  Extensions may be
  registered for informational purposes as long as there is a published
  specification that has been reviewed by a designated expert.

  The Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP, RFCs 7480-7484) is the
  proposed standard for retrieving registration metadata from both
  domain name and Regional Internet Registries.  To ensure interoperable
  implementations it's important to coordinate and standardize
  extensions and profiles to be used by registries.

  Extensions in both cases that are targeted for the Standards Track are
  subject to more thorough review and open discussion within the IETF.

  In addition, commonality may be discovered in related extensions,
  especially EPP extensions listed on the EPP extension registry, for
  which it would makes sense to merge them into a single standard
  extension everybody agrees on.

  The REGEXT working group is the home of the coordination effort for
  standards track extensions.  The selection of extensions for standards
  track shall incorporate the following guidelines.

  1. Proprietary documented extensions and individual submissions of
  informational or experimental EPP extensions will follow the expert
  review process as described in RFC7451 for inclusion in the EPP
  extensions registry. These documents will not be part of the REGEXT
  working group work or milestones. The working group may discuss or
  advise on these documents.

  2. Extensions that seek standards track status can be suggested for WG
  adoption.  If accepted by the working group then the development of
  the standard may proceed.

  3. When there are no more proposals for Standards-Track extensions,
  the working group will either close or become dormant, with the
  decision made in consultation with the responsible AD.  The charter
  will be reviewed by the end of 2017 and will be refreshed by
  rechartering if there is still a reason to keep the working group
  going.  In any case, the mailing list will remain open and available
  for the use of the expert review process as described in RFC7451.

  The working group will also identify the requirements for a
  registration protocol that allows a third-party service provider to
  exchange information with a registry without the need of a registrar
  proxy in the middle of the exchange.  These requirements will be
  documented in an Informational RFC.

  The working group will focus initially on the backlog of EPP and RDAP
  extensions.

Goals and Milestones:
  Mar 2016 - Submit for publication "Launch Phase Mapping for EPP"
  Mar 2016 - Submit for publication "TMCH functional specifications"
  Apr 2016 - Submit for publication "EPP and RDAP Status Mapping"
  Apr 2016 - Submit for publication "Registry Fee Extension for EPP"
  Apr 2016 - Submit for publication "Reseller Extension for EPP"
  Apr 2016 - Submit for publication "EPP Reseller Mapping"
  Jun 2016 - Submit for publication "Verification Code Extension for EPP"
  Jun 2016 - Submit for publication "EPP China Name Verification Mapping"
  Jun 2016 - Submit for publication "EPP Domain Name Mapping Extension for Bundling Registration"
  Oct 2016 - Submit for publication "Change Poll Extension for EPP"
  Oct 2016 - Submit for publication "Allocation Token Extension for EPP"
  Feb 2017 - Submit for publication draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap
  Feb 2017 - Submit for publication "EPP IDN Table Mapping"
  Feb 2017 - Submit for publication "CIRA IDN EPP Extension"
  Jun 2017 - Submit for publication an informational RFC with requirements for a registration protocol for third-party DNS providers


All charter page changes, including changes to draft-list, rfc-list and milestones:



Generated from PyHt script /wg/regext/charters.pyht Latest update: 24 Oct 2012 16:51 GMT -