* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Intarea Status Pages

Internet Area Working Group (Active WG)
Int Area: Suresh Krishnan, Terry Manderson | 2010-Mar-23 —  

2017-04-12 charter

Internet Area Working Group (intarea)


 Current Status: Active

     Juan-Carlos Zúñiga <juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com>
     Wassim Haddad <Wassim.Haddad@ericsson.com>

 Internet Area Directors:
     Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
     Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>

 Internet Area Advisor:
     Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>

 Mailing Lists:
     General Discussion: int-area@ietf.org
     To Subscribe:       https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
     Archive:            https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/

Description of Working Group:

    The Internet Area Working Group (INTAREA WG) acts primarily as a forum
    for discussing far-ranging topics that affect the entire area. Such
    topics include, for instance, address space issues, basic IP layer
    functionality, and architectural questions. The group also serves as a
    forum to distribute information about ongoing activities in the area,
    create a shared understanding of the challenges and goals for the area,
    and to enable coordination.

    The Internet Area receives occasional proposals for the development and
    publication of RFCs that are not in scope of an existing working group
    and do not justify the formation of a new working group. The INTAREA WG
    has a secondary role to serve as the forum for developing such work
    items in the IETF. The working group milestones are updated as needed
    to reflect the current work items and their associated milestones.

    New work must satisfy the following conditions:

    (1) WG consensus on the relevance for the Internet at large.

    (2) WG consensus on the suitability and projected quality of the
    proposed work item.

    (3) A core group of WG participants with sufficient energy and
    expertise to advance the work item according to the proposed

    (4) Commitment from the WG as a whole to provide sufficient
    and timely review of the proposed work item.

    (5) Agreement by the ADs, who, depending on the scope of the proposed
    work item, may decide that an IESG review is needed first.

Goals and Milestones:
  May 2010 - Submission of IPID document to the IESG as PS
  Aug 2010 - Submission of tunneling issues document to the IESG as Info
  Aug 2010 - Submission of tunneling security issues document to the IESG as Info

All charter page changes, including changes to draft-list, rfc-list and milestones:

Generated from PyHt script /wg/intarea/charters.pyht Latest update: 24 Oct 2012 16:51 GMT -