draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-13.txt   draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-14.txt 
Network Working Group S. Previdi, Ed. Network Working Group S. Previdi, Ed.
Internet-Draft C. Filsfils Internet-Draft C. Filsfils
Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. Intended status: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: December 22, 2017 K. Patel Expires: June 22, 2018 K. Patel
Arrcus, Inc. Arrcus, Inc.
S. Ray S. Ray
Individual Contributor Individual Contributor
J. Dong J. Dong
Huawei Technologies Huawei Technologies
June 20, 2017 December 19, 2017
BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-13 draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-14
Abstract Abstract
Segment Routing (SR) leverages source routing. A node steers a Segment Routing (SR) leverages source routing. A node steers a
packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by
prepending the packet with an SR header. A segment can represent any prepending the packet with an SR header. A segment can represent any
instruction, topological or service-based. SR allows to enforce a instruction, topological or service-based. SR allows to enforce a
flow through any topological path and service chain while maintaining flow through any topological path and service chain while maintaining
per-flow state only at the ingress node of the SR domain. per-flow state only at the ingress node of the SR domain.
skipping to change at page 1, line 49 skipping to change at page 1, line 49
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 22, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on June 22, 2018.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License. described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
skipping to change at page 3, line 8 skipping to change at page 3, line 8
6.6. Peer-Adj-SID for Node E, Link 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 6.6. Peer-Adj-SID for Node E, Link 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.1. New BGP-LS Protocol-ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.1. New BGP-LS Protocol-ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.2. Node Descriptors and Link Attribute TLVs . . . . . . . . 18 8.2. Node Descriptors and Link Attribute TLVs . . . . . . . . 18
9. Manageability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9. Manageability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
11. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 11. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
12. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 12. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 13. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 13.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 13.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
Segment Routing (SR) leverages source routing. A node steers a Segment Routing (SR) leverages source routing. A node steers a
packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by
prepending the packet with an SR header with segment identifiers prepending the packet with an SR header with segment identifiers
(SID). A SID can represent any instruction, topological or service- (SID). A SID can represent any instruction, topological or service-
based. SR allows to enforce a flow through any topological path and based. SR allows to enforce a flow through any topological path and
skipping to change at page 19, line 35 skipping to change at page 19, line 35
China China
Email: mach.chen@huawei.com Email: mach.chen@huawei.com
Acee Lindem Acee Lindem
Cisco Systems Inc. Cisco Systems Inc.
US US
Email: acee@cisco.com Email: acee@cisco.com
Ketan Talaulikar
Cisco Systems Inc.
India
Email: ketant@cisco.com
12. Acknowledgements 12. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jakob Heitz, Howard Yang, Hannes The authors would like to thank Jakob Heitz, Howard Yang, Hannes
Gredler, Peter Psenak, Ketan Jivan Talaulikar, Arjun Sreekantiah and Gredler, Peter Psenak, Arjun Sreekantiah and Bruno Decraene for their
Bruno Decraene for their feedback and comments. feedback and comments.
13. References 13. References
13.1. Normative References 13.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B.,
and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing Architecture", draft-ietf- Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing
spring-segment-routing-11 (work in progress), February Architecture", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13 (work
2017. in progress), October 2017.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC5065] Traina, P., McPherson, D., and J. Scudder, "Autonomous [RFC5065] Traina, P., McPherson, D., and J. Scudder, "Autonomous
System Confederations for BGP", RFC 5065, System Confederations for BGP", RFC 5065,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5065, August 2007, DOI 10.17487/RFC5065, August 2007,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5065>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5065>.
[RFC5307] Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "IS-IS Extensions [RFC5307] Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "IS-IS Extensions
in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS)", RFC 5307, DOI 10.17487/RFC5307, October 2008, (GMPLS)", RFC 5307, DOI 10.17487/RFC5307, October 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5307>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5307>.
[RFC6286] Chen, E. and J. Yuan, "Autonomous-System-Wide Unique BGP [RFC6286] Chen, E. and J. Yuan, "Autonomous-System-Wide Unique BGP
Identifier for BGP-4", RFC 6286, DOI 10.17487/RFC6286, Identifier for BGP-4", RFC 6286, DOI 10.17487/RFC6286,
June 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6286>. June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6286>.
13.2. Informative References 13.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext] [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext]
Previdi, S., Psenak, P., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Chen, Previdi, S., Psenak, P., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., and M.
M., and j. jefftant@gmail.com, "BGP Link-State extensions Chen, "BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing",
for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment- draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-03 (work in
routing-ext-01 (work in progress), February 2017. progress), July 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Aries, E., and D. Afanasiev, Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Dawra, G., Aries, E., and D.
"Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer Engineering", Afanasiev, "Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe-05 (work in Engineering", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-
progress), March 2017. epe-08 (work in progress), December 2017.
[RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and [RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and
S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and
Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752, Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016, DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>.
[RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running [RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205, Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016, RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
Stefano Previdi (editor) Stefano Previdi (editor)
Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Email: stefano@previdi.net Email: stefano@previdi.net
Clarence Filsfils Clarence Filsfils
Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc.
 End of changes. 20 change blocks. 
29 lines changed or deleted 34 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.46. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/