draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-00.txt   draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-01.txt 
Network Working Group R. Droms Network Working Group R. Droms
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems Internet-Draft Cisco Systems
Expires: August 23, 2003 February 22, 2003 Expires: October 7, 2003 April 8, 2003
Results from Interoperability Tests of DHCPv6 Implementations Results from Interoperability Tests of DHCPv6 Implementations
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-00.txt draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-interop-01.txt
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts. Drafts.
skipping to change at page 1, line 31 skipping to change at page 1, line 31
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 23, 2003. This Internet-Draft will expire on October 7, 2003.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract Abstract
This document publishes issues with the DHCPv6 protocols This document publishes issues with the DHCPv6 protocols
specifications, based on the results of interoperability testing specifications, based on the results of interoperability testing
among several implementations. among several implementations.
skipping to change at page 2, line 10 skipping to change at page 2, line 10
Standard, and several related specifications have been published and Standard, and several related specifications have been published and
will soon be submitted to the IESG for review. Several will soon be submitted to the IESG for review. Several
implementations of DHCPv6 have been completed, and these implementations of DHCPv6 have been completed, and these
implementations have been tested for interoperability. implementations have been tested for interoperability.
The purpose of this document is to provide a published record of the The purpose of this document is to provide a published record of the
issues discovered through interoperability testing, for review and issues discovered through interoperability testing, for review and
discussion by the appropriate IETF working groups. discussion by the appropriate IETF working groups.
A course of action to correct problems with the DHCPv6 specifications A course of action to correct problems with the DHCPv6 specifications
is proposed for many of the listed issues. Any changes to the is proposed for many of the listed issues. These changes will be
specifications will be published to the appropriate working group made to the DHCPv6 specification prior to its publication as an RFC.
mailing lists.
The remainder of this documents lists specific issues, along with a The remainder of this documents lists specific issues, along with a
summary of any discussion of the issue that has already occurred summary of any discussion of the issue that has already occurred
through e-mail and a proposed course of action to correct the issue. through e-mail and a proposed course of action to correct the issue.
Throughout this document, unless otherwise qualified, section Throughout this document, unless otherwise qualified, section
references and numbers refer to draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-28. references and numbers refer to draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-28.
1. Response of servers to Renew and Rebind messages, sections 18.2.3 and 1. Response of servers to Renew and Rebind messages, sections 18.2.3 and
18.2.4 18.2.4
skipping to change at page 6, line 40 skipping to change at page 6, line 39
Servers MUST discard any received Renew message that meets any Servers MUST discard any received Renew message that meets any
of the following conditions: of the following conditions:
+ the message MUST include a Server Identifier option + the message MUST include a Server Identifier option
+ the contents of the Server Identifier option MUST match the + the contents of the Server Identifier option MUST match the
server's identifier server's identifier
+ ... + ...
However, there should be a wording problem. The first sentence However, there is a wording problem. The first sentence should
should read: read:
Servers MUST discard any received Renew message that fails to Servers MUST discard any received Renew message that fails to
meet any of the following conditions: meet any of the following conditions:
Resolution: Review and reword appropriate text in section 15 for Resolution: Review and reword appropriate text in section 15 for
consistency and correctness. consistency and correctness.
8. Typographic error regarding MRC in section 18.1.6 8. Typographic error regarding MRC in section 18.1.6
Issue: In the following line of Section 18.1.6: Issue: In the following line of Section 18.1.6:
 End of changes. 

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.23, available from http://www.levkowetz.com/ietf/tools/rfcdiff/