draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt   draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt 
CCAMP Working Group Eric Mannie - Editor (KPNQwest) CCAMP Working Group Eric Mannie (KPNQwest)- Editor
Internet Draft Internet Draft Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel) - Editor
Expiration Date: October 2002 Stefan Ansorge (Alcatel) Expiration Date: December 2002
Stefan Ansorge (Alcatel)
Peter Ashwood-Smith (Nortel) Peter Ashwood-Smith (Nortel)
Ayan Banerjee (Calient) Ayan Banerjee (Calient)
Lou Berger (Movaz) Lou Berger (Movaz)
Greg Bernstein (Ciena) Greg Bernstein (Ciena)
Angela Chiu (Celion) Angela Chiu (Celion)
John Drake (Calient) John Drake (Calient)
Yanhe Fan (Axiowave) Yanhe Fan (Axiowave)
Michele Fontana (Alcatel) Michele Fontana (Alcatel)
Gert Grammel (Alcatel) Gert Grammel (Alcatel)
Juergen Heiles(Siemens) Juergen Heiles(Siemens)
Suresh Katukam (Cisco) Suresh Katukam (Cisco)
Kireeti Kompella (Juniper) Kireeti Kompella (Juniper)
Jonathan P. Lang (Calient) Jonathan P. Lang (Calient)
Fong Liaw (Zaffire) Fong Liaw (Sonas)
Zhi-Wei Lin (Lucent) Zhi-Wei Lin (Lucent)
Ben Mack-Crane (Tellabs) Ben Mack-Crane (Tellabs)
Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel)
Dimitrios Pendarakis (Tellium) Dimitrios Pendarakis (Tellium)
Mike Raftelis (White Rock) Mike Raftelis (White Rock)
Bala Rajagopalan (Tellium) Bala Rajagopalan (Tellium)
Yakov Rekhter (Juniper) Yakov Rekhter (Juniper)
Debanjan Saha (Tellium) Debanjan Saha (Tellium)
Vishal Sharma (Metanoia) Vishal Sharma (Metanoia)
George Swallow (Cisco) George Swallow (Cisco)
Z. Bo Tang (Tellium) Z. Bo Tang (Tellium)
Eve Varma (Lucent) Eve Varma (Lucent)
Maarten Vissers (Lucent) Maarten Vissers (Lucent)
Yangguang Xu (Lucent) Yangguang Xu (Lucent)
April 2002 June 2002
GMPLS Extensions to Control Non-Standard SONET and SDH Features Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Extensions to Control
Non-Standard SONET and SDH Features
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are
working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF),
its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may
also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors 1
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
progress." progress."
E. Mannie Editor 1
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001
To view the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the To view the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in an Internet-Drafts Shadow "1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in an Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directory, see http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. Directory, see http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract Abstract
This document is a companion to the GMPLS signaling extensions to This document is a companion to the Generalized Multiprotocol
control SONET and SDH document [GMPLS-SONET-SDH] that defines the Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling extensions to control SONET and
SONET/SDH technology specific information needed when using GMPLS SDH that define the SONET/SDH technology specific information
signaling. needed when using GMPLS signaling.
This informational document defines GMPLS signaling extensions to This informational document defines GMPLS signaling extensions to
control four optional non-standard (i.e. proprietary) SONET and control four optional non-standard (i.e. proprietary) SONET and
SDH features: group signals, arbitrary concatenation, virtual SDH features: group signals, arbitrary concatenation, virtual
concatenation of contiguously concatenated signals and per byte concatenation of contiguously concatenated signals and per byte
transparency. transparency.
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) [GMPLS-ARCH] extends MPLS from supporting Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) [GMPLS-ARCH] extends MPLS from supporting
skipping to change at line 106 skipping to change at line 108
signals (section 4), and per byte transparency (section 5). signals (section 4), and per byte transparency (section 5).
Section 6 gives examples of SONET/SDH traffic parameters (also Section 6 gives examples of SONET/SDH traffic parameters (also
referred to as signal coding) when requesting a SONET/SDH LSP. referred to as signal coding) when requesting a SONET/SDH LSP.
Such features are already implemented or under development by a Such features are already implemented or under development by a
significant number of manufacturers. For instance, arbitrary significant number of manufacturers. For instance, arbitrary
concatenation is already implemented in many legacy SONET and SDH concatenation is already implemented in many legacy SONET and SDH
equipment that don't support any byte-oriented protocol based equipment that don't support any byte-oriented protocol based
control plane. control plane.
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 2 Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 2
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001 draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
This document doesn't specify how to implement these features in This document doesn't specify how to implement these features in
the transmission plane but how to control their usage with a GMPLS the transmission plane but how to control their usage with a GMPLS
control plane. control plane.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL"
in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Signal Type Values Extension For Group Signals 2. Signal Type Values Extension For Group Signals
skipping to change at line 163 skipping to change at line 165
For example an STSG-48 could at one time consist of four STS-12c For example an STSG-48 could at one time consist of four STS-12c
signals and at another point in time of three STS-12c signals and signals and at another point in time of three STS-12c signals and
four STS-3c signals. four STS-3c signals.
Note that the use of VTG, TUG-X, AUG-N and STSG-M as circuit types is Note that the use of VTG, TUG-X, AUG-N and STSG-M as circuit types is
not described in ANSI and ITU-T standards. These signal types are not described in ANSI and ITU-T standards. These signal types are
conceptual objects that intend to designate a group of physical conceptual objects that intend to designate a group of physical
objects in the data plane. objects in the data plane.
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 3 Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 3
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001 draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
A label for AUG-X and STSG-3*X is assigned following the same rule A label for AUG-X and STSG-3*X is assigned following the same rule
as for the Standard Contiguous Concatenation (see [GMPLS-SONET- as for the Standard Contiguous Concatenation (see [GMPLS-SONET-
SDH]). SDH]).
A label for TUG-3 has K>0, L=0 and M=0. A label for VTG and TUG-2 A label for TUG-3 has K>0, L=0 and M=0. A label for VTG and TUG-2
within a VC-3 has K=0, L>0, M=0. A label for TUG-2 within a VC-4 within a VC-3 has K=0, L>0, M=0. A label for TUG-2 within a VC-4
has K>0, L>0, M=0. See [GMPLS-SONET-SDH] for KLM definition. has K>0, L>0, M=0. See [GMPLS-SONET-SDH] for KLM definition.
3. Contiguous Concatenation Extension 3. Contiguous Concatenation Extension
skipping to change at line 218 skipping to change at line 220
concatenated as described in section 2.1 of [GMPLS-SONET-SDH], concatenated as described in section 2.1 of [GMPLS-SONET-SDH],
identical contiguously concatenated signals may be virtually identical contiguously concatenated signals may be virtually
concatenated. In this last case, it allows for instance to request concatenated. In this last case, it allows for instance to request
the virtual concatenation of several VC-4-4c/STS-12c SPEs (i.e. the virtual concatenation of several VC-4-4c/STS-12c SPEs (i.e.
per [GMPLS-SONET-SDH] (STS-3c)-4c SPE), or more generally any VC- per [GMPLS-SONET-SDH] (STS-3c)-4c SPE), or more generally any VC-
4-Xc/STS-3c-Xc SPEs to obtain a VC-4-Xc-Yv/STS-3c-Xc-Yv. 4-Xc/STS-3c-Xc SPEs to obtain a VC-4-Xc-Yv/STS-3c-Xc-Yv.
The virtual concatenation can also be applied to arbitrary The virtual concatenation can also be applied to arbitrary
contiguously concatenated signals to form VC-4-Xa-Yv/STS-1-Xa-Yv contiguously concatenated signals to form VC-4-Xa-Yv/STS-1-Xa-Yv
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 4 Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 4
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001 draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
SPE/STS-3c-Xa-Yv SPE. Note that STS-3c-Xa-Yv SPE signal is SPE/STS-3c-Xa-Yv SPE. Note that STS-3c-Xa-Yv SPE signal is
described only for completeness of the mechanism defined in this described only for completeness of the mechanism defined in this
document. document.
The standard definition for virtual concatenation allows each The standard definition for virtual concatenation allows each
virtual concatenation components to travel over diverse paths. virtual concatenation components to travel over diverse paths.
Within GMPLS, virtual concatenation components must travel over Within GMPLS, virtual concatenation components must travel over
the same (component) link if they are part of the same LSP. This the same (component) link if they are part of the same LSP. This
is due to the way that labels are bound to a (component) link. is due to the way that labels are bound to a (component) link.
Note however, that the routing of components on different paths is Note however, that the routing of components on different paths is
indeed equivalent to establishing different LSPs, each one having indeed equivalent to establishing different LSPs, each one having
its own route. Several LSPs can be initiated and terminated its own route. Several LSPs can be initiated and terminated
between the same nodes and their corresponding components can then between the same nodes and their corresponding components can then
be associated together (i.e. virtually concatenated). be associated together (i.e. virtually concatenated).
In case of virtual concatenation of a contiguously concatenated In case of virtual concatenation of a contiguously concatenated
signal, the same rule as described in section 3 of [GMPLS-SONET- signal, the same rule as described in section 3 of [GMPLS-SONET-
SD] for virtual concatenation applies, except that a component of SDH] for virtual concatenation applies, except that a component of
the virtually concatenated signal is now a contiguously the virtually concatenated signal is now a contiguously
concatenated signal. The first label indicates the first concatenated signal. The first label indicates the first
contiguously concatenated signal; the second label indicates the contiguously concatenated signal; the second label indicates the
second contiguously concatenated signal, and so on. second contiguously concatenated signal, and so on.
5. Transparency Extension 5. Transparency Extension
This section defines the following optional extension for the This section defines the following optional extension for the
Transparency field defined in section 2.1 of [GMPLS-SONET-SDH]. Transparency field defined in section 2.1 of [GMPLS-SONET-SDH].
skipping to change at line 273 skipping to change at line 275
network or within the transparent network; nor network deployment network or within the transparent network; nor network deployment
scenarios. The signaling is independent of these considerations. scenarios. The signaling is independent of these considerations.
When the signaling is used between intermediate nodes it is up to When the signaling is used between intermediate nodes it is up to
a data plane profile or specification to indicate how transparency a data plane profile or specification to indicate how transparency
is effectively achieved in the data plane. When the signaling is is effectively achieved in the data plane. When the signaling is
used at the interfaces with the initiating and terminating LSRs it used at the interfaces with the initiating and terminating LSRs it
is up to the data plane specification to guarantee compliant is up to the data plane specification to guarantee compliant
behavior to G.707/T1.105 under fault free and fault conditions. behavior to G.707/T1.105 under fault free and fault conditions.
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 5 Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 5
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001 draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
Note that B1 in the SOH/RSOH is computed over the complete Note that B1 in the SOH/RSOH is computed over the complete
previous frame, if one bit changes, B1 must be re-computed. Note previous frame, if one bit changes, B1 must be re-computed. Note
that B2 in the LOH/MSOH is also computed over the complete that B2 in the LOH/MSOH is also computed over the complete
previous frame, except the SOH/RSOH. previous frame, except the SOH/RSOH.
When an "extended" transparent STM-N/STS-M (M=1, 3, 12, 48, 192, When an "extended" transparent STM-N/STS-M (M=1, 3, 12, 48, 192,
768) is requested, the label is coded as for the case of 768) is requested, the label is coded as for the case of
contiguous concatenation, i.e. it is in this case: S>0, U=0, K=0, contiguous concatenation, i.e. it is in this case: S>0, U=0, K=0,
L=0, M=0. L=0, M=0.
skipping to change at line 328 skipping to change at line 330
preserved. This means that a B1 bit error detection as described preserved. This means that a B1 bit error detection as described
above performed after the transparent transport (at a RS/Section above performed after the transparent transport (at a RS/Section
termination sink) indicates exactly the bit errors that occur termination sink) indicates exactly the bit errors that occur
between the B1 insertion point (RS/Section termination source) and between the B1 insertion point (RS/Section termination source) and
this point. Any intended changes to the previous RS/Section frame this point. Any intended changes to the previous RS/Section frame
content due to the implementation of the transparency feature (e.g. content due to the implementation of the transparency feature (e.g.
modifications of the RS/Section overhead, modifications of the modifications of the RS/Section overhead, modifications of the
payload due to pointer justifications) have to be reflected in the payload due to pointer justifications) have to be reflected in the
B1 BIP value, it has to be adjusted accordingly. B1 BIP value, it has to be adjusted accordingly.
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 6
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
If B2 transparency is requested, this means transparency for the bit If B2 transparency is requested, this means transparency for the bit
error supervision functionality provided by the B2. The B2 contains error supervision functionality provided by the B2. The B2 contains
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 6
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001
the BIP24*N/BIP8*N calculated over the previous MS/Line frame of the the BIP24*N/BIP8*N calculated over the previous MS/Line frame of the
STM-N/STS-N signal at the MS/Line termination source. At the MS/Line STM-N/STS-N signal at the MS/Line termination source. At the MS/Line
termination sink the B2 BIP is compared with the local BIP also termination sink the B2 BIP is compared with the local BIP also
calculated over the previous MS/Line frame of the STM-N/STS-N. Any calculated over the previous MS/Line frame of the STM-N/STS-N. Any
difference between the two BIP values is an indication for a bit difference between the two BIP values is an indication for a bit
error that occurred between the termination source and sink. In case error that occurred between the termination source and sink. In case
of B2 transparency this functionality shall be preserved. This means of B2 transparency this functionality shall be preserved. This means
that a B2 bit error detection as described above performed after the that a B2 bit error detection as described above performed after the
transparent transport (at a MS/Line termination sink) indicates transparent transport (at a MS/Line termination sink) indicates
exactly the bit errors that occur between the B2 insertion point exactly the bit errors that occur between the B2 insertion point
skipping to change at line 385 skipping to change at line 386
value 0, MT with value 1 and T with flag 5 and 10 to an STS-48 value 0, MT with value 1 and T with flag 5 and 10 to an STS-48
Elementary Signal. Elementary Signal.
4. An STS-768 signal with K1/K2 and LOH DCC transparency is formed 4. An STS-768 signal with K1/K2 and LOH DCC transparency is formed
by the application of RCC with flag 0, NCC with value 0, NVC with by the application of RCC with flag 0, NCC with value 0, NVC with
value 0, MT with value 1 and T with flag 5 and 7 to an STS-768 value 0, MT with value 1 and T with flag 5 and 7 to an STS-768
Elementary Signal. Elementary Signal.
5. 4 x STS-12 signals with K1/K2 and LOH DCC transparency is 5. 4 x STS-12 signals with K1/K2 and LOH DCC transparency is
formed by the application of RCC with value 0, NVC with value 0, formed by the application of RCC with value 0, NVC with value 0,
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 7
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
MT with value 4 and T with flags 5 and 7 to an STS-12 Elementary MT with value 4 and T with flags 5 and 7 to an STS-12 Elementary
Signal. Signal.
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 7
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001
6. A VC-4-3a signal is formed by the application of RCC with flag 6. A VC-4-3a signal is formed by the application of RCC with flag
2 (arbitrary contiguous concatenation), NCC with value 3, NVC with 2 (arbitrary contiguous concatenation), NCC with value 3, NVC with
value 0, MT with value 1 and T with value 0 to a VC-4 Elementary value 0, MT with value 1 and T with value 0 to a VC-4 Elementary
Signal. Signal.
7. An STS-1-34a SPE signal is formed by the application of RCC 7. An STS-1-34a SPE signal is formed by the application of RCC
with flag 2 (arbitrary contiguous concatenation), NCC with value with flag 2 (arbitrary contiguous concatenation), NCC with value
34, NVC with value 0, MT with value 1 and T with value 0 to an 34, NVC with value 0, MT with value 1 and T with value 0 to an
STS-1 SPE Elementary Signal. STS-1 SPE Elementary Signal.
8. 2 x STS-1-4a-5v SPE signal is formed by the application of RCC 8. 2 x STS-1-4a-5v SPE signal is formed by the application of RCC
with flag 2 (for arbitrary contiguous concatenation), NCC with with flag 2 (for arbitrary contiguous concatenation), NCC with
value 4, NVC with value 5, MT with value 2 and T with value 0 to value 4, NVC with value 5, MT with value 2 and T with value 0 to
an STS-1 SPE Elementary Signal. an STS-1 SPE Elementary Signal.
7. Acknowledgments 7. Acknowledgments
Valuable comments and input were received from many people. Valuable comments and input were received from the CCAMP mailing
list where outstanding discussions took place.
8. Security Considerations 8. Security Considerations
This draft introduces no new security considerations to [GMPLS- This draft introduces no new security considerations to [GMPLS-
SONET-SDH]. SONET-SDH].
9. References 9. Intellectual Property Notice
[GMPLS-SIG] Ashwood-Smith, P. et al, "Generalized MPLS - The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the
IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of
claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances
of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made
to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification
can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive
Director.
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 8
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
10. Normative References
[GMPLS-SIG] Berger, L. et al., "Generalized MPLS -
Signaling Functional Description", Internet Draft, Signaling Functional Description", Internet Draft,
draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-08.txt,
November 2001. April 2002.
[GMPLS-LDP] Ashwood-Smith, P. et al, "Generalized MPLS Signaling - [GMPLS-LDP] Ashwood-Smith, P., Berger, L. et al., "Generalized
CR-LDP Extensions", Internet Draft, MPLS Signaling - CR-LDP Extensions", Internet Draft,
draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05.txt, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-06.txt,
November 2001. April 2002.
[GMPLS-RSVP] Ashwood-Smith, P. et al, "Generalized MPLS [GMPLS-RSVP] Berger, L. et al, "Generalized MPLS
Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions", Internet Draft, Signaling - RSVP-TE Extensions", Internet Draft,
draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-07.txt,
November 2001. April 2002.
[GMPLS-SONET-SDH] E. Mannie Editor, "GMPLS extensions for SONET [GMPLS-SONET-SDH] Mannie, E., Papadimitriou D. et al.,
and SDH control", Internet Draft, "Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching extensions
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-04.txt, April for SONET and SDH control", Internet Draft,
2002. draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-05.txt, June 2002.
[GMPLS-ARCH] E. Mannie Editor, "GMPLS Architecture", Internet 11. Informative References
Draft, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt,
March 2002.
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 8 [GMPLS-ARCH] Mannie, E., Papadimitriou D. et al., " Generalized
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001 Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture",
Internet Draft,
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt,
March 2002.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels," RFC 2119. Requirement Levels," RFC 2119.
10. Authors Addresses 12. Contributors
Contributors are listed by alphabetical order.
Stefan Ansorge Stefan Ansorge
Alcatel Alcatel
Lorenzstrasse 10 Lorenzstrasse 10
70435 Stuttgart 70435 Stuttgart
Germany Germany
Phone: +49 7 11 821 337 44 Phone: +49 7 11 821 337 44
Email: Stefan.ansorge@alcatel.de Email: Stefan.ansorge@alcatel.de
Peter Ashwood-Smith Peter Ashwood-Smith
Nortel Networks Corp. Nortel Networks Corp.
P.O. Box 3511 Station C, P.O. Box 3511 Station C,
Ottawa, ON K1Y 4H7 Ottawa, ON K1Y 4H7
Canada Canada
Phone: +1 613 763 4534 Phone: +1 613 763 4534
Email: petera@nortelnetworks.com Email: petera@nortelnetworks.com
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 9
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
Ayan Banerjee Ayan Banerjee
Calient Networks Calient Networks
5853 Rue Ferrari 5853 Rue Ferrari
San Jose, CA 95138 San Jose, CA 95138
Phone: +1 408 972-3645 Phone: +1 408 972-3645
Email: abanerjee@calient.net Email: abanerjee@calient.net
Lou Berger Lou Berger
Movaz Networks, Inc. Movaz Networks, Inc.
7926 Jones Branch Drive 7926 Jones Branch Drive
skipping to change at line 497 skipping to change at line 531
Angela Chiu Angela Chiu
Celion Networks Celion Networks
One Sheila Drive, Suite 2 One Sheila Drive, Suite 2
Tinton Falls, NJ 07724-2658 Tinton Falls, NJ 07724-2658
Phone: +1 732 747 9987 Phone: +1 732 747 9987
Email: angela.chiu@celion.com Email: angela.chiu@celion.com
John Drake John Drake
Calient Networks Calient Networks
5853 Rue Ferrari 5853 Rue Ferrari
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 9
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001
San Jose, CA 95138 San Jose, CA 95138
Phone: +1 408 972 3720 Phone: +1 408 972 3720
Email: jdrake@calient.net Email: jdrake@calient.net
Yanhe Fan Yanhe Fan
Axiowave Networks, Inc. Axiowave Networks, Inc.
100 Nickerson Road 100 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752 Marlborough, MA 01752
Phone: +1 508 460 6969 Ext. 627 Phone: +1 508 460 6969 Ext. 627
Email: yfan@axiowave.com Email: yfan@axiowave.com
Michele Fontana Michele Fontana
Alcatel Alcatel
Via Trento 30, Via Trento 30,
I-20059 Vimercate, Italy I-20059 Vimercate, Italy
Phone: +39 039 686-7053 Phone: +39 039 686-7053
Email: michele.fontana@netit.alcatel.it Email: michele.fontana@netit.alcatel.it
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 10
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
Gert Grammel Gert Grammel
Alcatel Alcatel
Via Trento 30, Via Trento 30,
I-20059 Vimercate, Italy I-20059 Vimercate, Italy
Phone: +39 039 686-7060 Phone: +39 039 686-7060
Email: gert.grammel@netit.alcatel.it Email: gert.grammel@netit.alcatel.it
Juergen Heiles Juergen Heiles
Siemens AG Siemens AG
Hofmannstr. 51 Hofmannstr. 51
skipping to change at line 551 skipping to change at line 584
1194 N. Mathilda Ave. 1194 N. Mathilda Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Email: kireeti@juniper.net Email: kireeti@juniper.net
Jonathan P. Lang Jonathan P. Lang
Calient Networks Calient Networks
25 Castilian 25 Castilian
Goleta, CA 93117 Goleta, CA 93117
Email: jplang@calient.net Email: jplang@calient.net
Fong Liaw
Solas Research
Email: fongliaw@yahoo.com
Zhi-Wei Lin Zhi-Wei Lin
Lucent Lucent
101 Crawfords Corner Rd 101 Crawfords Corner Rd
Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030 Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 10
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001
Phone: +1 732 949 5141 Phone: +1 732 949 5141
Email: zwlin@lucent.com Email: zwlin@lucent.com
Ben Mack-Crane Ben Mack-Crane
Tellabs Tellabs
Email: Ben.Mack-Crane@tellabs.com Email: Ben.Mack-Crane@tellabs.com
Eric Mannie Editor & Primary Point of Contact
KPNQwest
Terhulpsesteenweg 6A
1560 Hoeilaart - Belgium
Phone: +32 2 658 56 52
Mobile: +32 496 58 56 52
Fax: +32 2 658 51 18
Email: eric.mannie@kpnqwest.com
Dimitri Papadimitriou
Alcatel
Francis Wellesplein 1,
B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone: +32 3 240-8491
Email: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Dimitrios Pendarakis Dimitrios Pendarakis
Tellium Tellium
Phone: +1 (732) 923-4254 Phone: +1 (732) 923-4254
Email: dpendarakis@tellium.com Email: dpendarakis@tellium.com
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 11
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
Mike Raftelis Mike Raftelis
White Rock Networks White Rock Networks
18111 Preston Road Suite 900 18111 Preston Road Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75252 Dallas, TX 75252
Phone: +1 (972)588-3728 Phone: +1 (972)588-3728
Fax: +1 (972)588-3701 Fax: +1 (972)588-3701
Email: Mraftelis@WhiteRockNetworks.com Email: Mraftelis@WhiteRockNetworks.com
Bala Rajagopalan Bala Rajagopalan
Tellium, Inc. Tellium, Inc.
skipping to change at line 613 skipping to change at line 633
Yakov Rekhter Yakov Rekhter
Juniper Networks, Inc. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Email: yakov@juniper.net Email: yakov@juniper.net
Debanjan Saha Debanjan Saha
Tellium Optical Systems Tellium Optical Systems
2 Crescent Place 2 Crescent Place
Oceanport, NJ 07757-0901 Oceanport, NJ 07757-0901
Phone: +1 732 923 4264 Phone: +1 732 923 4264
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 11
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-02.txt April, 2001
Fax: +1 732 923 9804 Fax: +1 732 923 9804
Email: dsaha@tellium.com Email: dsaha@tellium.com
Vishal Sharma Vishal Sharma
Metanoia, Inc. Metanoia, Inc.
335 Elan Village Lane 335 Elan Village Lane
San Jose, CA 95134 San Jose, CA 95134
Phone: +1 408 943 1794 Phone: +1 408 943 1794
Email: vsharma87@yahoo.com Email: vsharma87@yahoo.com
skipping to change at line 643 skipping to change at line 659
Z. Bo Tang Z. Bo Tang
Tellium, Inc. Tellium, Inc.
2 Crescent Place 2 Crescent Place
P.O. Box 901 P.O. Box 901
Oceanport, NJ 07757-0901 Oceanport, NJ 07757-0901
Phone: +1 732 923 4231 Phone: +1 732 923 4231
Fax: +1 732 923 9804 Fax: +1 732 923 9804
Email: btang@tellium.com Email: btang@tellium.com
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 12
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
Eve Varma Eve Varma
Lucent Lucent
101 Crawfords Corner Rd 101 Crawfords Corner Rd
Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030 Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030
Phone: +1 732 949 8559 Phone: +1 732 949 8559
Email: evarma@lucent.com Email: evarma@lucent.com
Maarten Vissers Maarten Vissers
Lucent Lucent
Botterstraat 45 Botterstraat 45
Postbus 18 Postbus 18
1270 AA Huizen, Netherlands 1270 AA Huizen, Netherlands
Email: mvissers@lucent.com Email: mvissers@lucent.com
Yangguang Xu Yangguang Xu
Lucent Lucent
21-2A41, 1600 Osgood Street 21-2A41, 1600 Osgood Street
North Andover, MA 01845 North Andover, MA 01845
Email: xuyg@lucent.com Email: xuyg@lucent.com
E. Mannie Editor Internet-Draft October 2002 12 13. Editors
Eric Mannie
KPNQwest
Terhulpsesteenweg 6A
1560 Hoeilaart - Belgium
Phone: +32 2 658 56 52
Mobile: +32 496 58 56 52
Fax: +32 2 658 51 18
Email: eric.mannie@kpnqwest.com
Dimitri Papadimitriou
Alcatel
Francis Wellesplein 1,
B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone: +32 3 240-8491
Email: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
14. Full Copyright Statement
"Copyright (C) The Internet Society (date). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph
are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 13
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-03.txt June, 2002
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
Mannie & Papadimitriou Editors Internet-Draft December 2002 14
 End of changes. 

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.23, available from http://www.levkowetz.com/ietf/tools/rfcdiff/