* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Avtcore Status Pages

Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance (Active WG)
Art Area: Adam Roach, Alexey Melnikov, Ben Campbell | 2011-Jan-26 —  

IETF-102 avtcore minutes

Session 2018-07-16 1550-1750: Notre Dame - Audio stream - avtcore chatroom


minutes-102-avtcore-00 minute

          Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance (avtcore) Working Group
          CHAIRS:  Jonathan Lennox
                    Rachel Huang
          Monday, 16 July 2018 at 15:50-17:50 (Zurich A)
          1. Note Well, Note Takers, Agenda Bashing - (Chairs, 15:50, 5 min)
          Note takers: Timothy Terriberry
          Jabber: Magnus Westerlund
             Status of working group drafts:
                      [RFC Editor Queue: MISSREF: Bundle]
                   Will check on the mailing list. If nobody cares, remove from
                   The droping ratio issu is agreed to be irrelevant with frame
                   marking draft. Authors need to respond the comments from WGLC,
                   and submit a new version to address them.
          2. RMCAT Feedback Message Work Status (Colin Perkins, 15:55, 20 min)
          - juberti asked how this differs from the draft-holmberg feedback format
            + Suggested working group put weight behind one message format
              * This is a WG draft and the others never progressed beyond individual
              drafts, so this is that format
          - baboba asked for compelling reason to implement
            + cperkins says that this fits with the way RTP does sequence numbers
            better, so it is more future proof
          - halvestrand says the last time he asked his team, converting to the new
          format will not be hard, and if more browsers are generating feedback
          in this format than the one that Chrome is using, then Chrome will be
          - nohlmeier: we never implemented the old non-standard one, so we think
          we should implement the standard one
            + baboba: No, you'll have to do both, because the old one is already
            deployed and won't be upgraded
              * cjennings: Sort of disagree, you shipped for five years without
              implementing either
          - juberti: if this is a natural evolution of our stuff, we can kind of
          look into it and get back to you
          - juberti: is there somewhere the benefits are written down?
            + cperkins: maybe in a previous meeting's minutes, benefits are:
              * Reports on ECN, other one doesn't
              * Handles SSRCs and sequence numbers better, so more future proof
              * Packets are smaller
            + juberti: any performance surprises because we no longer have the
            global sequence number?
              + cperkins/jlennox: no, you can recover the global loss fraction
              easily, and the more fine-grained information is there if you can
              make use of it
          3. Multiplexing guidelines (Magnus, 16:15, 20 min)
          - No comments from WG on open issues
          - mwesterlund: next version before bangkok
          4. Frame Priority Marking RTP Header Extension  (Roni Even, 16:35,
          20 min)
          - jlennox: do you have people outside of Huawei interested in this work?
            + reven: we're doing this internally
          - jlennox: we're going to defer this until frame marking is done
          5. Next steps and open mic - (Chairs, 16:55, 5 min)
          - mzanaty: Lot of changes to frame marking draft based on feedback
            + reven: I will do another WG last call
              * bcampbell (AD hat on): last time feedback came in slowly, please
              turn this around quickly
          - reven (payload): one more draft in WGLC
            + jlennox: and juberti and I owe you VP9

Generated from PyHt script /wg/avtcore/minutes.pyht Latest update: 24 Oct 2012 16:51 GMT -