* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Aqm Status Pages

Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling (Active WG)
Tsv Area: Mirja Kühlewind, Spencer Dawkins | 2013-Sep-27 —  
Chairs
 
 


2016-11-01 charter

Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling (aqm)
---------------------------------------------------

 Charter

 Current Status: Active

 Chairs:
     Richard Scheffenegger <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
     Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>

 Transport Area Directors:
     Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
     Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>

 Transport Area Advisor:
     Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>

 Mailing Lists:
     General Discussion: aqm@ietf.org
     To Subscribe:       https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
     Archive:            https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/

Description of Working Group:

    Internet routers, lower-layer switches, end-host operating
    systems, device drivers, and many types of additional
    middleboxes include memory buffers in which they implement
    queues to hold packets that require processing or otherwise
    need to wait for forwarding to the next hop.

    The queues are intended to absorb bursts of traffic that may
    naturally occur, and avoid unneccessary losses.  However, queues
    also cause latency and jitter in the eventual arrival times of
    packets.  This can create issues and complications for interactive
    applications.

    Extremely large unmanaged buffers have been noticed in some
    software and equipment.  When these buffers start to fill,
    interactive applications and other traffic can be severely
    impacted or completely broken, due to high and potentially
    oscillating delays.

    The Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling working group
    (AQM) works on algorithms for managing queues in order to:

    (1) minimize the length of standing queues, helping
    to reduce delay for interactive applications

    (2) help flow sources control their sending rates without
    unnecessary losses, e.g., through Explicit Congestion
    Notification (ECN)

    (3) consider the merits of various techniques to protect flows
    from negative impacts of other more aggressive or misbehaving
    flows

    (4) help avoid global synchronization of flows sharing a
    bottleneck

    The AQM working group will produce documents that cover the
    design, use, configuration, and monitoring of algorithms for
    managing queues in Internet devices and software. The scope
    includes both how to best configure existing equipment and
    software, as well as recommendations on designing new equipment
    and software.

    The AQM working group will also publish algorithm specifications
    that are found to be broadly applicable and beneficial.  Evaluating
    these algorithms shall be done in coordination with the Internet
    Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG), and related IETF Working
    Groups, such as the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques Working
    Group (RMCAT), in order to select and assess the relevant criteria,
    scenarios, and metrics.

    The working group will also explore the merits of whether to
    isolate flows, and mechanisms for performing this function.  Note
    that isolation and potentially policing of flows implies some policy
    beyond what is required to simply minimize queues.  This topic
    requires significant attention in the working group.

    AQM algorithms do not have to be implemented universally in order
    to be effective.  Specifications will aid in producing proper
    implementations that avoid potential ambiguities and corner cases.
    "Interoperability" of algorithms and implementations of them is
    not the reason for creating these specifications; correctness is
    the primary motivation.

    The working group will not make changes to existing IETF protocols,
    but the working group may use Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN),
    Diffserv, and other mechanisms maintained by the TSVWG working group.
    Since the implementation of these mechanisms is likely to be entwined
    with AQM algorithms, there is expected to be close coordination
    between the TSVWG and AQM groups.

    Many AQM algorithms have been proposed in academic literature, but
    a smaller number are widely implemented and deployed.  The goal of the
    working group is to produce recommendations that will actually be used,
    and algorithms that will actually be implemented, deployed in equipment,
    and enabled.  Towards these ends, the group actively encourages
    participation from operators and implementers. Furthermore, the group
    will jointly work with the Routing and Internet Area in order to
    involve vendors of networking equipment in the development of the
    AQM mechanisms.

    Wider research and evaluation of AQM mechanisms shall be
    coordinated with the IRTF/ICCRG, and significant participation in this
    WG from the academic and research community is highly desirable, when
    it is directly relevant to implementation and deployment.

    Combined Queue Management / Packet Scheduling algorithms are in-scope,
    provided their benefits have been evaluated against the established
    requirements for an AQM algorithm. It is expected that some classes of
    algorithms will focus on software implementations, while others on
    existing or new hardware deployments, and algorithms may be specific
    to distinct scenarios.

Goals and Milestones:
  Done     - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC 2309
  Done     - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication as Informational
  Dec 2015 - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard


All charter page changes, including changes to draft-list, rfc-list and milestones:



Generated from PyHt script /wg/aqm/charters.pyht Latest update: 24 Oct 2012 16:51 GMT -