* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Alto Status Pages

Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (Active WG)
Tsv Area: Mirja Kühlewind, Spencer Dawkins | 2008-Nov-12 —  
Chairs
 
 


IETF-99 alto minutes

Session 2017-07-20 1330-1530: Karlin III - Audio stream - alto chatroom

Minutes

minutes-99-alto-00 minutes



          IETF 99, July 16-21, 2017. Prague, Czech Republic
          ALTO WG Meeting, Thu
          Jul 20, 2017 1330-1530 Karlin IIIÊÊÊÊ
          Notetakers: Lyle Bertz, Sabine
          RandriamasyÊÊÊ
          1330 - 1340 10' Agenda bash and WG update (Chairs)
          - Focus is to finish chartered items so the agenda is based on this
          (charter & milestone items are first; new topics are best effort)
          -
          Goal is to finish milestones @ IETF-101
          - Richard : Finish means?Ê
                        Jan: If something is close to WGLC that should work; in
          principal finish means WGLC
          - Last meeting: adopted path vector, unified
          prop, cdni
          - milestones: Multi-Cost OK
          - ALTO performance metrics needs
          more work (review)
          - Props, Path Vector & CDNI need more work
          - Other
          business?
                         - Richard:Ê
                      - What is the timing
          for the next wg meeting if not meeting @ IETF 100?
                          -
          Jan: Timeframe is around Singapore
                     - AD: Clarification
          that meeting should not be at the time of IETF but closer to IETF
          100Ê
                       - Workshop is mid August in Los Angeles with LHC
          and other teams.
          1340 - 1355 15' ALTO cost calendar, S. Randriamasy
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-02ÊÊ
          - Reviewed all updates
          - Discussion Items
                    - - RY
          several time granularities. Client can aggregate itself ?
          => SR: yes the server should provide finest granularity.
          (TODO: the client SHOULD interpret the time interval size as the finest
          available from server).
                          - Richard / Sabine agree to
          move ahead on granularity response
                   - Sabine - The ALTO server
          provides the finest grain value for the time-intervalÊ
          - Jan: After
          issues herein are closed does the team agree this should WGLC (hum)
                       - Result: No hums against moving it to WGLC once issues/open
          items are resolved
                          - Please make the resolutions on
          this on the list
          1355 - 1410 15' ALTO cost context, S. Randriamasy
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-randriamasy-alto-cost-context-02
          - Reviewed Concepts and Updates per WG feedback
          - Questions:Ê
          - Dawn - One suggestion is to make suggestion to specifiy the order of
          the response (has this been considered)?
                          - Different
          options were discussed. Will continute to mailing list.
                      -
          Would adding context to the cost add extra privacy concerns?
                   -
          This should be discussed in the document.
                      - Richard -
          point out that this is part of a more generalized issue of a type
          system in ALTO
                     - Type system was urged to be a future
          dicussion on this matter
                          - Richard: we need reconsider
          cost type design (type, mode, where fit context?)
                          -
          Seb: IANA considerations ?
                            ==> SR yes we need
          look at other IETF Work and consider IANA registration.
          - For now,
          chair ask is to move ahead but since it is not part of the milestones
          we will leadÊ
          1410 - 1425 15' ALTO incremental updates, R. Yang
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/
          - Overview of changes
          - Does WG believe this is ready for WGLC after
          items are completed (hum)?
                   - No reaction either way
          - Sabine
          - Main task is complete but needs work to specify who is sending a
          SSE and for what reason
                     - Suggestion is that we can make
          the Client/Server roles more explicit
          - JS: JSON patch important for
          CDNI. WG seems now more active on that one.
          - SR: needs clarification
          on who requires what for what
          - RY: yes we will need to clarify that
          
          1425 - 1435 10' CDN Footprints and Capability Advertisements, R. Yang
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://www.ietf.org/id/draft-seedorf-cdni-request-routing-alto-10.txt
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊ (This is a WG draft; needs to be resubmitted with the
          correct name.)
          - Jan presenting
          - Advanced design is being looked
          at but the focus is the basic design
          - Richard - Discussion wrt
          the envelope name
                         - outcome is to use somehting
          like "cdni/fci"
          1435 - 1450 15' ALTO path vector, D. Chan
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector/
          - Discussed 3 remaining design issues
          - Point raised about
          why this technique for MIME is not used in SSE
          - Privacy
          implications exist for cross product query but PID flows don't
          
          1450 - 1455 05' Extensible property maps for ALTO, D. Chan
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-roome-alto-unified-props-new/
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊ (This is a WG draft; needs to be resubmitted with the correct
          name.)
          -Ê With no time left, discussion will be deferred to the list
          -Ê Jan: Please don't add use cases every 2 months or it will never get
          done
          1455 - 1500 05' ALTO cross-domain server discovery, S. Kiesel
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc/
          -Ê Richard - Document is useful but if we can carve out the principal
          it would be helpful, can you come up with more clear principles?
          -  JS:
          seb said will look at it.
          -Ê Will review Richard's comments and move
          to WGLC
          1500 - 1509 09' ALTO cellular address extension, S. Randriamasy
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses-00ÊÊ
          -Ê Proposed based on prior work
          -Ê Lyle - Ignore leading 0 concern
          as they are about LR(0) parsing and over the wire frame alignment
          1509 - 1518 09' ALTO extension: Flow-based cost query, J. Zhang
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gao-alto-fcs/
          -Ê No time for discussion.Ê All comments/discussions
          pushed to the mailing list.
          1518 - 1527 09'
          Resource Orchestration for Multi-Domain Data Analytics, Q. Xi
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiang-alto-exascale-network-optimization/
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊ (Possible remote presentation)
          -Ê No time for discussion.Ê All
          comments/discussions pushed to the mailing list.
          ÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ
          1527 - 1530 03'
          Wrap up / Other business
          -Ê Next virtual interim meeting will be posted
          on the mailing list
          AO = ALTO
          AOS = ALTO Server
          AOC = ALTO Client
          
          



Generated from PyHt script /wg/alto/minutes.pyht Latest update: 24 Oct 2012 16:51 GMT -