* WGs marked with an * asterisk has had at least one new draft made available during the last 5 days

Proposed IESG statement on Perpass and DISCUSSes

When an extension or minor update is made to an existing protocol that has unaddressed issues, it would not be appropriate to hold a DISCUSS on that document demanding that the problem in the base protocol specification be addressed; rather, the way to address problems of this sort is to update the base protocol specification. For example, the IETF identified pervasive monitoring as a risk that working groups consider. This would not justify holding a DISCUSS on the extension or minor update.